ON THE CASE OF CONFORMITY OF PART 2 OF ARTICLE 52, POINT 4 OF PART 2 OF ARTICLE 231 AND PART 3 OF ARTICLE 231 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ON THE BASIS OF THE APPLICATIONS OF AGASI TER-YESAYAN AND NSHAN ISPIRYAN
ON THE CASE OF CONFORMITY OF PART 4, ARTICLE 59 AND ARTICLE 77 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ON THE BASIS OF THE APPLICATION OF THE FIRST INSTANCE COURT OF GENERAL JURISDICTION OF SYUNIK MARZ OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA
ON THE CASE OF CONFORMITY OF POINT 4, PART 2, ARTICLE 158 OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ON THE BASIS OF THE APPLICATION OF JACLYN AYANYAN, TSAGHIK AYANYAN AND KARINE AYANYAN
ON THE CASE OF CONFORMITY OF PART 2 OF ARTICLE 205 OF THE RA ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE CODE WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ON THE BASIS OF THE APPLICATION OF VARUJHAN AVETISYAN
ON THE CASE OF CONFORMITY OF PART 15 OF ARTICLE 1801 OF THE CODE ON ADMINISTRATIVE OFFENCES OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ON THE BASIS OF THE APPLICATIONS OF VARTGEZ GASPARI AND VARDUHI MKRTCHYAN
ON THE CASE OF CONFORMITY OF PART 6 OF ARTICLE 9 OF THE RA LAW ON SOCIAL GUARANTEES OF STATE OFFICIALS WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ON THE BASIS OF THE APPLICATION OF THE RA ADMINISTRATIVE COURT
ON THE CASE OF CONFORMITY OF POINT 1 OF PART 1 OF ARTICLE 233.1OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ON THE BASIS OF THE APPLICATIONS OF VACHIK KARAPETYAN, LUSINE AMIRBEKYAN AND GEGHAM MELIKSETYAN
ON THE CASE OF CONFORMITY OF PART 1 OF ARTICLE 283 AND PART 3 OF ARTICLE 288 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ON THE BASIS OF THE APPLICATIONS OF PAVEL MANUKYAN AND VARUZHAN AVETISYAN
ON THE CASE OF CONFORMITY OF ARTICLE 249 OF THE CIVIL CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ON THE BASIS OF THE APPLICATION OF THE CITIZEN MARETA ARAQELYAN
ON THE CASE OF CONFORMITY OF PART 1 OF ARTICLE 207, PART 1 OF ARTICLE 140, PART 3 OF ARTICLE 213 OF THE RA CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ON THE BASIS OF THE APPLICATION OF VARTGEZ GASPARI
ON THE CASE OF CONFORMITY OF PART 1 OF ARTICLE 87 OF THE RA ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE CODE WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ON THE BASIS OF THE APPLICATION OF GEVORG SAFARYAN
ON THE CASE OF CONFORMITY OF PART 1 OF ARTICLE 185 OF THE RA ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE CODE IN REGARD TO THE PHRASE “AFTER ITS EMERGENCE” WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ON THE BASIS OF THE APPLICATION OF LILIT MUSEYAN
ON THE CASE OF CONFORMITY OF PARAGRAPH 2 OF PART 1 OF ARTICLE 27 OF THE LAW ON NOTARY OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA AND SUB-POINT A OF POINT 1 OF PART 1 OF ARTICLE 3 OF THE LAW ON PRINCIPLES OF ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ON THE BASIS OF THE APPLICATION OF LUSINE ALEKSANYAN, NARINE SAKEYAN, HASMIK VARDANYAN AND GAGIK AVETISYAN
ON THE CASE OF CONFORMITY OF PARTS 1 AND 4 OF ARTICLE 132, POINT 3 OF PART 1 OF ARTICLE 136 OF THE RA ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE CODE WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ON THE BASIS OF THE APPLICATION OF LALA ASLIKYAN
ON THE CASE OF CONFORMITY OF THE PROVISION “WITH THE EXCEPTION OF CASES PROVIDED FOR IN ARTICLE 5 OF THE LAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ON ADVOCACY” STIPULATED BY PART 1 OF ARTICLE 40 OF THE RA CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE AND PART 3 OF ARTICLE 5 OF THE RA LAW ON ADVOCACY WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ON THE BASIS OF THE APPLICATION OF HMAYAK KHALAFYAN, ANAHIT VARDANYAN, VARDAN KHALAFYAN AND ANI KHALAFYAN
ON THE CASE OF CONFORMITY OF POINT 2 OF ARTICLE 2477 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA AND POINTS 1 AND 2 OF PART 1 OF ARTICLE 23 OF THE LAW ON COMPULSORY ENFORCEMENT OF COURT DECREES OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ON THE BASIS OF THE APPLICATION OF “GOLDEN FIELD” LLC
ON THE CASE OF CONFORMITY OF ARTICLE 71 OF THE RA LAW ON STATE REGISTRATION OF RIGHTS TO THE PROPERTY WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ON THE BASIS OF THE APPLICATION OF THE NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION "FREEDOM OF INFORMATION CENTER"
ON THE CASE OF CONFORMITY OF PARTS 1 AND 5 OF ARTICLE 156, POINT 1 OF PART 1 OF ARTICLE 160 OF THE RA ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE CODE WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ON THE BASIS OF THE APPLICATIONS OF KAREN HARUTYUNYAN, ARTAK GEVORGYAN, DAVIT HARUTYUNYAN AND VARTGEZ GASPARI
ON THE CASE OF CONFORMITY OF POINTS 1 AND 3 OF PART 1 OF ARTICLE 53, POINTS 1 AND 2 OF PART 2 OF ARTICLE 53 AND POINT 4 OF PART 2 OF ARTICLE 57 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ON THE BASIS OF THE APPLICATIONS OF THE PROSECUTOR GENERAL OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA
ON THE CASE OF CONFORMITY OF ARTICLE 244 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ON THE BASIS OF THE APPLICATION OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDER OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA
The website of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Armenia has been created as part of the Partnership for Good Governance (PGG II) Project ''Support to the judicial reform – enhancing the independence and professionalism of the judiciary in Armenia'' co-funded by the European Union and the Council of Europe. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of either party.
The upgrade of the official website of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Armenia is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) as a part of the USAID/Armenia Justice Sector Support Project. The content of this website is the sole responsibility of the Constitutional Court and does not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government.